The C.A. Service Sponsorship Group

Facilitating Unity and Service throughout Cocaine Anonymous since October 15, 2019

Menu
  • Upcoming Meetings
  • Group Services
    • Got a Question? Need an AI Service Sponsor?
    • Become of Member of this Group
    • Group Servants
      • Cameron F. (C.A. Service Resume)
  • Bylaws of C.A.
    • 12 Steps of C.A.
    • 12 Traditions of C.A.
    • 12 Concepts of C.A.
  • 7th Tradition
  • Articles
    • Official C.A. Logo’s
  • C.A. Online Recovery Area
  • Site Map
Menu

Category: Unity

The Rise of the Elder Statesman and the Fall of the Bleeding Deacon

Posted on October 17, 2025 by The Webservant

Written By Pat P.

I was in an Area Service meeting not long ago when a long-time member—someone I’ve known for two decades—decided it was the perfect time to publicly assassinate my character. No warning. No gentle lead-in. Just a sudden, full-volume, room-wide announcement that I was “a bully” for making a Fifth Concept statement.

I’ve been in Cocaine Anonymous since 1994. Thirty-one years sober. I’ve had three fantastic sponsors—real elder statesmen—who drilled into me the importance of putting “principles before personalities.” But let me tell you, it’s a lot harder to keep that principle front and centre when you’re being blindsided in a room of twenty-five people by someone you once shared a cigar with.

This guy—thirty-seven years in CA—decided Robert’s Rules of Order didn’t apply when it came to making sure everyone could hear his personal review of my conduct. He ignored the sanctity of process so he could swing his verbal bat in public. And after dropping the grenade, he left the meeting early. A real mic-drop moment.

Here’s the thing: I knew him when he was an elder statesman. Back then, he served without making it about himself. He had a calm way of reminding us the group’s Higher Power was in charge. But somewhere along the way, the elder statesman became the bleeding deacon. I’ve seen it before, and I know I’ll see it again, because it’s not rare.

In CA, a bleeding deacon is that long-timer who thinks the group can’t survive without them, resents change, and fights the group conscience instead of serving it. The roots are usually the same: stagnation, no new service commitments, no fresh challenges, no growth. They stop being accountable to a sponsor—or they have one who won’t call them out. Their minds close. “I know best” becomes the guiding principle. And any new idea is treated like a threat instead of an opportunity.

This guy’s service résumé lately? Shows up to one meeting a week. Recently took a GSR position for the first time in over a decade—not to carry the message, but to argue about updated bylaws. That’s not service. That’s politics.

We say alcohol is like truth serum, but anger works the same way. Not the whole truth, not God’s honest truth, but their truth—the one they’ve been nursing in silence, sometimes for years. When he blew up at me in that meeting, it wasn’t about my Fifth Concept statement. That was just the trigger. The real stuff—the long-stewed resentments, the unspoken judgments—came rushing out.

I’d love to say I responded with perfect restraint, but that’s not the truth. In that moment, with twenty-five sets of eyes on me, I felt like I’d been sucker-punched. My first reaction wasn’t serenity—it was fire. I raised my voice. I called him out for being out of line and out of order. I felt attacked, and I met attack with attack. Later in the meeting, when I had the floor again, I did what my sponsors taught me. I made amends to the group for letting my emotions get the better of me. I didn’t excuse my part just because “he started it.” I owned it. That’s the work—not that we always stay calm, but that we clean it up when we don’t.

My first three sponsors were the opposite of this. They had the ability to let go of something they’d helped create so it could grow. That’s the elder statesman’s gift—to be able to step back without resentment and trust that the fellowship will be guided by a Higher Power, even if the new direction isn’t the one they’d choose. It’s not easy. It requires humility, trust, and the willingness to be uncomfortable. It requires keeping our own spiritual house in order so our service is about the group, not about our identity.

The sad truth is this isn’t just about one man. He’s an example of something that happens in every fellowship: members with decades of sobriety who stop being challenged. No more deep Step work, no more serious sponsorship. Their world shrinks to one meeting a week, same people, same topics. And when change shows up? Rage. Rage against the dying of the light. It’s a spiritual sickness, plain and simple. Our literature warns that “we are never cured of our addiction.” That doesn’t just mean the drugs—it means the defects that drive it. If we’re not growing spiritually, we’re going backwards. And the longer we’ve been around, the easier it is to coast—until something threatens our comfort zone.

One bleeding deacon in a service body is bad enough. But stack up enough of them, and you’ve got a slow-motion collapse on your hands. They feed off each other’s resistance to change. They’ll kill a motion before it even hits the floor, drive away new servants, and argue over bylaw punctuation while the newcomer meeting across town folds for lack of support. Give them long enough without anyone speaking out or holding them accountable, and the Area will die—one meeting at a time, until there are none left.

This isn’t about shaming anyone. It’s a mirror. Because here’s the truth: I’m capable of becoming the same bleeding deacon if I stop doing the work. If I stop seeking guidance. If I start thinking CA needs me more than I need CA. That’s why we rotate service positions. That’s why we stay active in sponsorship, keep going to different meetings, and keep learning. My sponsors drilled it into me: service without the Traditions and Concepts becomes politics. Recovery without service becomes selfishness. The elder statesman keeps both in balance.

The fall from elder statesman to bleeding deacon doesn’t happen overnight. It’s death by spiritual neglect—and it can happen to any of us. The cure isn’t complicated: keep working the Steps, stay accountable to a sponsor who will call you out, stay willing to be uncomfortable, and let go when it’s time to rotate out. We keep what we have by giving it away—and that includes power, control, and the need to be right.

As for my old cigar buddy? I’ll leave his name out. That’s what “principles before personalities” means. But I’ll tell the story—because CA needs to remember that elder statesmen don’t just appear. They’re built, one day, one meeting, and one humble act of service at a time. And if we stop building, we start bleeding.

WSC APPROVED LITERATURE, BOOKS, AND GUIDELINES

Posted on February 11, 2020March 2, 2020 by The Webservant

From the World Service Manual 2020 pp. 88-89

Books:

A Quiet Peace
Hope, Faith & Courage: Stories from the Fellowship of Cocaine Anonymous
Hope, Faith & Courage Volume II: Stories and Literature from the Fellowship of Cocaine
Anonymous
Pamphlets:
. . . And All Other Mind Altering Substances
12 Principles
A Guide to the 12 Steps
A Higher Power
A New High from H&I
Anonymity
Being of Service
C.A is Also for the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or Transgender Addict
Cocaine Anonymous Self Test
Choosing Your Sponsor
Crack
Do’s & Don’ts for 12th-Step Calls for Addicts
Having Fun in Recovery
Newcomer Booklet
Reaching Out to the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
The 7th Tradition
The First 30 Days
The Home Group
Tips for Staying Clean & Sober
To the Newcomer
Too Young to Recover?
Tools of Recovery
Unity
What is C.A.?
Yes, You Can Start a C.A. Meeting
Other Materials:
C.A. Fact File
C.A Infoline Numbers
Reaching Out Card
Suggested Participation Meeting Format
Traditions Group Inventory

Guidelines And Workbooks

1. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Committee Guidelines
2. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Hospitals and Institutions Committee
Guidelines and Information
3. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Convention Committee Guidelines
4. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Literature, Chips, & Formats Committee Guidelines
5. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Manual
6. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Public Information Workbook
7. Cocaine Anonymous World Service Structure & Bylaws Guidelines
8. Financial Guidelines for Groups, Districts & Areas of Cocaine Anonymous
9. Information Technology Workbook and Guidelines
10. Unity Guidelines/Duties

ADVISORY OPINIONS

In addition, the World Service Conference has passed the following Advisory Opinions:

August 20, 1989: “THE BOOKS ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AND TWELVE STEPS AND
TWELVE TRADITIONS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS ARE TWO OF OUR MOST
VALUABLE TOOLS OF RECOVERY AND AS SUCH, IT IS THE OPINION OF COCAINE
ANONYMOUS THAT MEETINGS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THESE BOOKS
AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT MEMBERS IN THEIR RECOVERY.”

September 4, 2004: “THE BOOK, “A.A. SERVICE MANUAL”, COMBINED WITH THE
“TWELVE CONCEPTS FOR WORLD SERVICE” IS A VALUABLE TOOL OF RECOVERY
IN SERVICE, AND AS SUCH, IT IS THE OPINION OF COCAINE ANONYMOUS THAT
MEETINGS AND SERVICE MEETINGS WITHIN THE FELLOWSHIP SHOULD BE
ALLOWED TO HAVE THIS BOOK AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE MEMBERS IN
THEIR RECOVERY.”

Case Study: An agnostic group rewrites the 12 Steps.

Posted on January 6, 2020June 22, 2022 by The Webservant

An agnostic group, based on group conscience, rewrites Steps 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of C.A. into their own version?

Step Two: Came to accept and to understand that we needed strengths beyond our awareness and resources to restore us to sanity. [Was: Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.]

Step Three: Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of the C.A. program. [Was: Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God, as we understood Him.]

Step Five: Admitted to ourselves without reservation, and to another human being, the exact nature of our wrongs. [Was: Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.]

Step Six: Were ready to accept help in letting go of all our defects of character. [Was: Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.]

Step Seven: Humbly sought to have our shortcomings removed. [Was: Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.]

Step Eleven: Sought through mindful inquiry and meditation to improve our spiritual awareness, seeking only for knowledge of our rightful path in life and the power to carry that out. [Was: Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.]

Clarifying Questions and Answers:

Can this group still be identified as part of C.A.? Explain Why or Why Not?

Does this group’s action affect other groups? If Yes: Should the group be expelled —no longer endorsed by C.A. at the Area Level and removed from the C.A. meeting list? 

How might the Traditions be used to resolve this schism—both within the group and at the Area Level?

Case Study: A Group is using non-conference approved literature in their meeting.

Posted on January 6, 2020June 22, 2022 by The Webservant

Suggested Readings:

Cocaine Anonymous World Service Manual 2020 Edition p. 14

Cocaine Anonymous groups, meetings and service committees should only use, display, distribute or sell the following literature and materials: the WSC Approved Literature set forth in the Appendix, the books “ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS,” “TWELVE STEPS AND TWELVE TRADITIONS,” and “The A.A. Service Manual, combined with the 12 Concepts For World Service,” and Cocaine Anonymous World Service, Region, Area, District and group/ meeting approved flyers, meeting directories and other materials displaying the C.A. logo as described above

CA Newsgram, Second Quarter 2007, Vol. 24 No. 2 “Conference Approved Literature” (World Service Board of Trustees)

“Clearly, if the reading/writing that the group/meeting/committee wants to use is not on the Conference-approved list contained in the (WSC) Manual’s Appendix, and there has been no advisory opinion to date authorizing its reference and use, the subject materials should not be used. The language cited, therefore, is the clear conscience of our entire Fellowship regardless of whether we, as a board, or any member of the Fellowship or group argues or decides whether the word “should” is suggestive, as some members of the Fellowship argue, or directive, as others might argue. The intent and spirit of including that paragraph (WSC Approved Literature) was and is to set a base level of appropriate materials and readings for all groups of C.A. throughout our world.”

CA NewsGram, Fourth Quarter 2009, Vol. 26 No.3 “A.A.’s “How It Works” and Cocaine Anonymous (World Service Board of Trustees)

Update as of December 5, 2009: It is the position of the World Service Board of Trustees that the C.A. version of How it Works is not considered C.A. approved literature. In the spirit of unity, our common welfare, and our observance of the Twelve Traditions, we suggest that your group have a business meeting to determine the well-informed group conscience as to what readings shall be used in your meeting formats.

The Language of the Heart: Bill W’s Grapevine Writings. pp. 80-81

Bill Wilson on Tradition Four: “With these concepts in mind, let us look more closely at Tradition 4. The first sentence of Tradition 4 guarantees each A.A. group local autonomy. With respect to its own affairs, the group may make any decisions, adopt any attitudes that it likes. No over-all or intergroup authority should challenge this primary privilege. We feel this ought to be so, even though the group might sometimes act with complete indifference to our tradition. For example, an A.A. group could, if it wished, hire a paid preacher and support him out of the proceeds of a group night club. Though such an absurd procedure would be miles outside our tradition, the group’s “right to be wrong” would be held inviolate. We are sure that each group can be granted, and safely granted, these most extreme privileges. We know that our familiar process of trial and error would summarily eliminate both the preacher and the night club. Those severe growing pains which invariably follow any radical departure from A.A. tradition can be absolutely relied upon to bring an erring group back into line. An A.A. group need not be coerced by any human government over and above its own members. Their own experience, plus A.A. opinion in surrounding groups, plus God’s prompting in their group conscience would be sufficient. Much travail has already taught us this. Hence we may confidently say to each group, “You should be responsible to no other authority than your own conscience.”.

Clarifying Questions and Answers:

Is it OK for a group to use non-conference approved literature in meetings?

Does non-conference approved literature imply Conference disapproval? If yes? Would that imply that C.A. has an opinion on outside issues?

Does the group’s use of Non-Conference approved literature at their meetings affect C.A. as a whole? If Yes, How is our common welfare impacted by the use of these materials at C.A. meetings and events?

Is there a list of C.A. Approved Literature? A: Yes – click here.

Case Study: What can a Group do about a disruptive member?

Posted on January 6, 2020June 22, 2022 by The Webservant

A member continuously disrupts group meetings with loud abusive and bullying behaviour towards fellow members and newcomers. Membership in the group continues to decline. New people coming to the meeting for the first time often do not return.

Suggested Readings:

AA, Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, P. 143-144

The elders led Ed aside. They said firmly, “You can’t talk like this around here. You’ll have to quit it or get out.” With great sarcasm Ed came back at them. “Now do tell! Is that so?” He reached over to a bookshelf and took up a sheaf of papers. On top of them lay the foreword to the book “Alco­holics Anonymous,” then under preparation. He read aloud, “The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.” Relentlessly, Ed went on, “When you guys wrote that sentence, did you mean it, or didn’t you?” Dismayed, the elders looked at one another, for they knew he had them cold. So Ed stayed.

The Twelve Traditions Illustrated

Our brother the noisy drunk affords the simplest illustration of this Tradition (One). If he insists on disrupting the meeting, we “invite” him to leave, and we bring him back when he’s in better shape to hear the message. we are putting the “common welfare” first. But it is his welfare, too; if he’s ever going to get sober, the group must go on functioning, ready for him.

Clarifying Questions and Answers:

Can a member be thrown out of a group for disrupted, abusive behaviour?

How might the group deal with a member whose conduct is threatening the common welfare of the group?

Case Study: Does Fundraising Conflict with Tradition Seven and Concept Seven?

Posted on January 6, 2020August 25, 2025 by The Webservant

Discussion Points:

Fundraising conflicts with the expressed and adopted definition of the phrase “fully self-supporting” from Tradition Seven, which states, “all expenses are to be liquidated by individual contributions”. Our founders wished to be very clear. Fundraising activity interferes with our faith that a God of our understanding will direct and provide for our fellowship if we follow traditions. Practicing tradition is our path to a higher power and true unity.

Fundraising activities divert time, resources, intention and focus of individuals and groups from our primary purpose as stated in Tradition Five. Extraordinary time and energy are put into making events “successful” rather than purposeful.

When fundraising generates monies, controversy results concerning “money, property or prestige”. The traditions are unequivocal about the danger to unity of these subjects. Prudent reserves may become inflated and committees dependent upon fundraising events are pressured to raise more funds for bigger and better events. This further leads us away from the spiritual focus of our fellowship and our primary purpose as stated in Tradition Five.

Fundraising activities in meetings changes the atmosphere in meetings so necessary to our primary purpose of carrying the message to the newcomer. Intimidating, enthusiastic or manipulative sales behaviours are not supportive of our relationship to the newcomer. Inaccurate impressions of our program and purpose are made to newcomers and non-addict visitors. Some members of our fellowship will only attend some meetings if they can promote fundraising events, a significant diversion from our primary purpose.

Fundraising diminishes individual member’s and group’s abilities to effect change or voice discontent with any committee by the practice of with holding funds from the “basket” or donations from the group. Committees are often substantially financed by fundraising allowing them to ignore any diminished funding from the “basket”. This principle created by our tradition’s founders is inherent in the 7th Tradition and is a right granted to individual members.

Fundraising promotes governance rather than service, which is a clear contradiction expressed in the Tradition Two. Committees may decide on activities supported by fundraising which may have no relation to the collective group conscience. Majority democratic votes are used by committees often to rationalize this behaviour. Democratic votes, while useful are not to be confused with, nor are they the equivalent of, the spiritual concept of the conscience of the fellowship. Governance of this sort can also justified by the notion that what we are doing is “good” or “necessary”—euphemisms for “the ends justify the means.” Governance is organizational self will and blocks the effect of “a loving God as he may express himself in or group conscience”, central to the 2nd Tradition.

Fundraising permits the receipt of outside contributions to the funding of our fellowship, precisely prohibited by our 7th Tradition. There is no way to establish membership at the time of sale of goods or services and some activities such as raffles, lotteries, auctions of donated merchandise and resale of outside event tickets skirt legalities and does associate our fellowship with outside enterprises.

Fundraising encourages our membership to miss the underlying spiritual experiences inherent in the phrase “fully self-supporting”. Simplicity, faith, generosity and responsibility are for many, necessary experiences required to have changed lives, becoming fully contributing members to our fellowship and to society as a whole.

Various fundraising activities encourage our membership to continue the self-centered behaviour of “giving only if there is something in it for me”. This does not contain the underlying spiritual principles of generosity, faith, selflessness and “giving freely of what we have found,” inherent in the principle of self- support of Tradition Seven.

Social events once designed to promote recovery, fellowship and a sense of belonging, all worthy contributions of fellowship to the goal of unity, have changed from activities designed to celebrate the freedom of recovery to events with the primary purpose of fundraising. This often excludes members from fellowship activities who see fundraising activity contrary to many of the traditions.

For obvious practical requirements and to ensure fullest participation in fellowship events, entire fellowship support is required. This support is simply measured by the willingness of individual member contributions to fund a particular service. No financial support for a particular event or service is one indication of the expression of our collective group conscience. Funding from the fellowship donations helps to avoid the creation of committee events that a particular local area may not be large enough to support or indeed even desire. Funding of events by fundraising thought to be ” good” are not a substitute for informed group conscience, the spiritual essence of Tradition Two and our collective path to a higher power.

Fundraising activities conducted in the group setting change our group to a “business” activity rather than a “spiritual entity”. Our founders of the traditions cautioned in the creation of Tradition Five that business and spirituality should not be mixed, that discussions of money should be kept to a minimum, that we embrace the notion of corporate poverty and that we be ever vigilante in matters of money. Beware. They are seldom as emphatic as when discussing the subject of money and the 12 step fellowship.

Discussion Questions

Is your Group’s Fundraising efforts taking your fellowship in a different direction?

Does your Area’s fundraising efforts circumvent the ‘power of the purse?’

If your group withholds contributions from your Area in an effort to exercise its “power of the purse,” should your Group’s GSR communicate that decision with the Area Delegate?

A suggested format for resolving conflicts within the Group

Posted on October 15, 2019January 6, 2020 by The Webservant

This format can be used at the Group’s Business Meeting and facilitated by either the GSR or Meeting Chair.

Suggested Group Business Meeting Format for resolving conflicts, schisms, cliques and strivings for power, prestige and money within the Group.

Open with a prayer (“WE” version of the Serenity Prayer).

Read the 12 Traditions, followed by: “Traditions are to the group what the steps are to the individual”.

Read: “Therefore, no society of men and women ever had a more urgent need for continuous effectiveness and permanent unity. We addicts see that we must work together and hang together, else most of us will finally die alone. The ’12 Traditions’ of Cocaine Anonymous are, we C.A.’s believe, the best answers that our experience has yet given to those ever-urgent questions, ‘How can C.A. best function?’ and, ‘How can C.A. best stay whole and so survive?'”

Read Tradition One: (Short Form) Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon C.A. unity. (Long Form) Each member of Cocaine Anonymous is but a small part of a great whole. C.A. must continue to live or most of us will surely die. Hence our common welfare comes first. But individual welfare follows close afterward.

Set Parameters for Initial Discussion:

Read Tradition Twelve: (Long Version) “We of Cocaine Anonymous believe that the principle of anonymity has an immense spiritual significance. It reminds us that we are to place principles before personalities; that we are actually to practice a genuine humility. This to the end that our great blessings may never spoil us; that we shall forever live in thankful contemplation of Him who presides over us all.

  • State the problem or conflict that has arisen
  • Ask what steps have been taken so far to solve the problem on a group level. If this is a continuation of a previously tabled discussion, then the minutes of the last meeting ought to be read.
  • Open the discussion by allowing members to voice their perspective on the matter.

Remember the Facilitator’s role is to:

  • Ask clarifying questions
  • Reiterate the TwelveTraditions
  • Facilitate resolutions from the group —Not to dictate answers
  • Listen for finger-pointing, blame, accusations
  • Listen for answers and resolutions

After the initial discussion, ask the group:

  • To what length are the group members willing to cooperate and come to a consensus on a solution?
  • Implement the solution OR table discussion until the next business meeting.

Close with a prayer (“WE” version of the Serenity Prayer).

Translate this Website

Got a Question? Ask our Virtual Service Sponsor

Get answers to your service questions by asking our Virtual AI CA Service Sponsor.

Cocaine Anonymous Online Recovery Area

https://onlinerecoveryarea.org

C.A. Service Sponsorship Inquiry Form

Questions or comments about Service Sponsorship? Want to be a Member of the C.A. Service Sponsorship Group?

Click Here!

T: 416-533-6024
E: rsvp@caservicesponsorship.org


Make a 7th Donation
Contribute your 7th Tradition donation to the C.A. Service Sponsorship Group

Current Time Around the World




Recent Posts

  • Starting a Virtual 12-Step Cocaine Anonymous Meeting
  • The Rise of the Elder Statesman and the Fall of the Bleeding Deacon
  • Standing Committees
  • I’ve been asked to speak at a 12 Step meeting…what should I talk about?
  • Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Charter

Article Categories

  • Area Service
  • C.A. Policy
  • Case Studies
  • Concepts
  • Conference
  • Group Service
  • Robert's Rules of Order
  • Service Learning Modules
  • Service Sponsorship
  • Speaker Coaching
  • Standing Committees
  • Traditions
  • Unity

In Service Since October 15, 2019

CA-12-Traditions-Workbook-2025-08-30
CA-12-Concepts-Workbook-2025-08-30

Member of the Online Recovery Area of Cocaine Anonymous

About the C.A. Service Sponsorship Meeting

We’re an open meeting of Cocaine Anonymous. We meet virtually every Sunday at 7:30 pm (Eastern) for the purpose of recruiting, educating and activating C.A. Trusted Servants to ensure continuous service to those who suffer from addiction. The C.A. Service Sponsorship Group presents service topics for study, discussion and practice of service sponsorship in Cocaine Anonymous at the Group, District, Area and World level of service.


CA-12-Traditions-Workbook-2025-08-30
CA-12-Concepts-Workbook-2025-08-30

 

Recent Posts

  • Starting a Virtual 12-Step Cocaine Anonymous Meeting
  • The Rise of the Elder Statesman and the Fall of the Bleeding Deacon
  • Standing Committees

C.A. Service Structure

For a full description of C.A.’s Service Structure…

Practicing Genuine Humility

Site Disclaimer

Cocaine Anonymous is a Fellowship of, by, and for addicts seeking recovery. Friends and Family of addicts should contact Co-Anon Family Groups, a Fellowship dedicated to their much different needs. Some of the items contained in these pages are published with permission of C.A. World Services, but this does not imply endorsement of this website by the C.A. World Service Conference or the C.A. World Service Office. The information provided within this website is intended to be a convenience for those who visit our website. Such inclusion does not constitute or imply endorsement by, or affiliation with, the Area or the Districts within. “Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Approved Literature. Copyright © 2025 Cocaine Anonymous World Services. “C.A.”, “Cocaine Anonymous” and the C.A. logo are registered trademarks of Cocaine Anonymous World Services. All rights reserved.” “In the spirit of Tradition Six, C.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organization or institution. As such in the Area, District, Service Committees of Cocaine Anonymous and Cocaine Anonymous as a whole does not endorse and is not affiliated with or any of the companies and/or services offered on the site. Any links to external websites or services are only provided as a convenience to our members.

©2026 The C.A. Service Sponsorship Group